Skip to content

Chinese Government Card Swipe Crackdown Hits Macau

Chinese Government Card Swipe Crackdown Hits Macau

Gambling funds obtained through illicit card-swiping in Macau are estimated to 12 per cent of mass market turnover. (Image: Brain)

The result of Asia’s imminent crackdown on the usage of hand-held card swipers is being felt in Macau, with the Wynn Macau witnessing its biggest market decline since October 2011.

Macau’s casino economy has soared within the last few years, so much so that it now eclipses Las Vegas once the gambling capital of the world, nevertheless the Chinese government’s unexpected enforcement of a ban on illegal cash transfers has investors worried; Wynn Resorts Ltd. fell recently to 8.5 percent during the close in Hong Kong trading, while MGM Asia Holdings Ltd. dropped 8.2 % for the period that is same. The Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd., meanwhile, fell 7.6 percent, while Sands Asia Ltd. dropped 4.6 per cent, and SJM Holdings Ltd., 6.6 per cent.

Visitors to Macau from the mainland are permitted to bring only 20,000 yuan ($3,200) into the gambling hub and may also only withdraw 10,000 yuan per time, per card, from money devices. To swerve the limitations, tourists are able to purchase goods from local pawn shops using their debit cards and then trade them for local currency with the pawnbroker that is same.

Illegal Card-Swiping Amounts to $6 Billion

However, the increasing use of card-swiping machines in gambling enterprises has not only caused a slump in Macau’s pawnbroking industry, but it is also got the Chinese authorities jittery about tens of billions of yuan in illegal funds which are being taken out of the mainland and into Macau.

According to Karen Tang, an analyst at Deutsche Bank AG in Hong Kong, funds obtained through illicit card-swiping in Macau are estimated to amount to $6 billion per that’s about 12 percent of mass market turnover year.

Macau authorities made 12 arrests involving pay card fraud cases in February and March of this present year. Six individuals were arrested on February eighteenth, with UnionPay card terminals, account publications and HK$700,000 of cash seized. Then, on March 6th, police said that they had arrested four more and more people, with three China UnionPay card terminals, purchase receipts and HK$920,000 confiscated; two different people were arrested eight days later and police discovered four re payment terminal devices, 304 bank cards, verification devices, card consumption receipts, Chinese travel permits and much more than HK$3.4 million ($438,000) in cash.

While China announced it might be imposing restrictions regarding the utilization of state-backed debit card business UnionPay, the organization itself told press that it works closely with the authorities to fight all types of illegal bank card usage.

Visa Restrictions

Meanwhile, the China that is state-owned Central station reported Macau may also face a tightening of control of its visa applications. Macau visitors whom didn’t travel on up to a third-party nation could get a stamp on their passport, which would jeopardize future visa applications.

The boom in Macau in modern times has been in component due to the expansion of Chinese tourism, which has in turn been fueled by the emergence of a leisure by the Chinese federal government in the restriction of motion for its citizens. These restrictions that are new be another source of anxiety for Macau’s investors.

However, Union Gaming analyst Grant Govertsen urged investors not to panic, saying, ‘Judging from past experience, it’s often all bark with no bite. The shortening of a visitor’s stay or the stricter use of money cards will not always suppress the gamblers’ capacity to gamble.’

Illinois Lawmaker Makes Final Stand for Gambling Expansion

Democratic Illinois Representative Bob Rita is frustrated at shortage of enthusiasm for their Illinois gambling bill, but still believes it could be passed. (Image: AP/Seth Perlman)

The clock could be ticking and the chances may be against him, but Democratic Representative Bob Rita, the key sponsor of a bill to expand gambling into the state of Illinois, is building a last-ditch try to gather help for the legislation he believes will help plug a $1.8 billion hole in state coffers.

While Illinois debates whether to give the present short-term income tax in order to cope with the deficit, Rita expressed their frustration at a shortage of urgency through the state’s politicians in a letter to House Speaker Michael Madigan and Republican frontrunner Jim Durkin this week.

‘The reception to these amendments has been underwhelming,’ reported Rita, who added that he doesn’t understand why a bill that passed out of the upper chamber seems become lacking any support.

Down to the Wire

The legislation, scheduled to be heard in a House committee Monday, had not been called for a vote, but there’s still a slim chance that the bill could possibly be changed or redrafted, and then passed by the Legislature before the May 31 deadline, and Rita is desperate to rally the troops.

Bill SB1849 proposes two options: a) the creation of five casinos that are new including one in Chicago, also as new slots and horseracing tracks; or b) the building of a Vegas-style ‘mega casino’ in Chicago.

$1 Billion a for state and city year

‘The Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce testified month that is last a Chicago casino alone could generate almost $1 billion a year in income for hawaii and town, and that a 10,000-position casino as I permitted for in one amendment is probably not enough to generally meet the customer demand,’ said Rita.

The temporary tax hike runs down in January and it’s perhaps not known whether Democrats will garner sufficient votes to secure an extension. ‘Clearly, we are planning to need revenue,’ reasoned Rita in his letter.

It’s clear that Bob Rita has his work cut down for him. Similar gambling plans were passed by the legislature before, only to be vetoed at the hurdle that is last Governor Pat Quinn. Quinn has yet to express whether he would approve the measure, but he demonstrably has hang-ups about Chicago’s checkered history of mobsters and corruption his two predecessors have been in prison for the latter and the idea of casino expansion makes him jittery. He vetoed an expansion bill in 2012 on the grounds that it lacked standards that are ethical would attract ‘unsavory impacts.’

No ‘Loopholes for Mobsters’

‘We’re not likely to have loopholes for mobsters in Illinois,’ Quinn said at the time. ‘The bill that was on my desk had been woefully lacking when it found integrity that is protecting honesty and regulation of gambling in our state.’

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, meanwhile, has said he wants to solve the $100 million pension crisis before considering gambling expansion.

Casino gaming stumbled on Illinois in 1990 utilizing the passage through of the Riverboat Gambling Act, partly in reaction to Iowa’s decision to legalize riverboat gaming along the Mississippi River. At first the boats were needed to cruise until law ended up being passed in 1999 permitting them to moor permanently. Ten licenses were granted initially, with the proviso that no casino would be permitted within Cook County, in order to preserve Chicago’s famous horseracing songs, which are in opposition to Rita’s efforts to expand casino gambling in their state.

New Lucky Streaks Learn Actively Seeks Just What Makes Winners

Gamblers on winning streaks might seem to win more often, but a scholarly study says that’s only simply because they’re making safer bets. (Image:

Those who have ever stepped base in a very casino or just made a few friendly wagers with friends has probably run across a streak of amazing good or luck that is bad least when. It’s that evening where you can’t lose at roulette also at the poker table if you try, or the one where every coin flip goes against you.

For some gamblers, superstition and luck play major roles in their casino routines. Others point out that believing one could predict such good and streaks that are bad just a kind of the gambling fallacy, and that there is no solution to know whether random answers are going to turn in your favor. But a study that is new this is not exactly true, thanks to the practices associated with gamblers by themselves.

Winners Keep Winning, Losers More Likely to Lose Once Again

According up to a study that is new University College London psychology teacher Nigel Harvey and graduate pupil Juemin Xu, it turns out that winning players do tend to keep winning, while losers are more likely to carry on their losing streaks. The research, posted in the might 2014 issue of Cognition, looked over online gamblers at an activities gambling site to come to these conclusions.

Don’t worry: the study didn’t just rewrite the laws of likelihood. Instead, it turns out that gamblers tend to engage in behavior that improves the odds that they’re going to carry on winning (or losing) more regularly than one may expect.

The study looked at over 565,000 bets made by 776 bettors. Any customer made, their odds of winning was just 48 percent on the first bet. A follow-up compared to that winner would win at a 49 percent rate a really increase that is small barely seems significant. But from then on, the chances went through the roof. A third bet would win 57 percent of the time after two wins. Then 72 percent, and finally 75 percent of the time for the sixth bet in a winning streak if the streak kept going, the next bets would win 67 percent of the time. Meanwhile, losing players saw their odds plunge as time continued. After a loss, gamblers would only return to win 47 percent of the time. That number dropped to 45 percent, and kept going down all the way to an astounding 23 percent after six losses after two losses.

Betting Behavior Accounts for Change

The numbers are difficult to argue with. However if streaks aren’t predictable, exactly what could be causing this? The researchers first looked to see if the players aided by the winning streaks were simply better at betting than those that has runs that are bad. But in the end, both groups lost almost precisely the same amount of money per lb they bet. Instead, it ends up that the answer ended up being in the kinds of bets the gamblers had been making. Players on winning streaks increasingly switched to safer bets in order to keep their streaks alive.

Meanwhile, losers had been trying riskier and riskier bets either to chase their losings, or simply because they felt their fortune had to change soon. That behavior had been perhaps inspired by the gambler’s fallacy: the idea that results need to ‘balance’ a new player’s luck. However, it really served to increase the chance that the streaks would continue.

Essentially, the ‘hot hand’ fallacy (the belief that hot streaks will carry on, or the contrary of this gambler’s fallacy) was found become true, but just because players were actively helping their streaks to last longer than they would should they made similar bets regardless of their recent results. It’s not math that is new’s merely another way in which human behavior can cause some unexpected results.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *