Skip to content

Before a write-up is accepted for publication, this has to be reviewed by researchers employed in the field that is samereferees).

Before a write-up is accepted for publication, this has to be reviewed by researchers employed in the field that is samereferees).

The most important characteristic of an academic or scholarly paper is that it has got to pass an academic quality assessment before it may be published in an academic journal (the DEFSA website is an authorised ePublication). This control process is known as peer-reviewing and is designed to guarantee the academic standard of an article.

What exactly is an academic research paper?

An paper that is academic not a social commentary, an impression or a “blog”. An academic paper begins with a thesis – the writer of the academic paper is designed to persuade readers of an idea or way to an issue predicated on EVIDENCE – not personal opinion.

Academic writing should present your reader with an informed argument. To create an informed argument, you need to first you will need to work through everything you know about a topic from that which you think or feel about a topic. You could begin by posing a question that may result in your idea (in which case, your idea will be the reply to your question), you can also make a thesis statement. Or you can do both: you can ask a concern and immediately suggest the clear answer that your particular essay will argue.

The study process is certainly not simply collecting data, evidence, or “facts,” then copy-and-pasting” this preexisting information into a paper. Instead, the study process is about investigation —asking questions and developing answers through serious critical thinking and thoughtful reflection. Most research involve at least a study or questionnaire soliciting opinions from a sample that is reasonably-sized of participants.

How are Academic Papers assessed?

  1. May be the Full Paper an accurate reflection associated with title, abstract and keywords?
  2. Does the paper clearly state the problem, outcomes, findings or conclusions. Is the structure regarding the paper clear and logical?
  3. Does the paper clearly define the methodology, research tools and research questions?
  4. Does the paper include sufficient relevant theory and is such knowledge clearly portrayed and correctly cited?
  5. Does this paper present knowledge that is new insights, and suggest future work in the field of design education.
  6. Are any right parts of the paper weak or lacking, and how could these be improved?
  7. Have ethical requirements been addressed, including how the extensive research was conducted.
  8. Does the paper stay glued to the style guidelines?

In addition, papers presented at DEFSA Academic conferences are evaluated in a Double Blind Peer Review from the criteria that are following

  1. Does the paper address the conference theme?
  2. Does the paper subscribe to Design Education (or closely related) focus areas? It is critical to remember that papers must address issues pertaining to design education such as knowledge production, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, and not designing or perhaps the design profession.
  3. Does the paper present an academically sound argument that contributes to original research output?
  4. The abstract contains a short summary associated with article along with a description of this objective, method, result and conclusion associated with study. Keywords (or words that are subject, which identify the contents associated with article, may also be given into the abstract. An abstract is between 300 and 500 words.

    A Full Paper can contain as much as 5 000 words, and consists of the following:


  5. Briefly describe the focus associated with the paper that is overall its main points
  6. Highlight background information or issues essential to understand the direction of this paper. The evaluator may never be from your own field of design.
  7. Define any terminology that is key to comprehend the topic

  9. Finish along with your thesis statement
  10. Research Method and material

    • The methodology and methods ought to be reasonable for and appropriate to that particular which will be being studied.
    • Identify the methods used to identify and locate sources additionally the rationale useful for selecting the sources to analyse. The detail must certanly be sufficient so that the research process can be assessed, and reproduced by future researchers.
    • Explain the procedures employed for analysing the information and arriving at findings.


    • Important information is given textual form preferably using tables and figures. Even unexpected or negative email address details are presented.


    • The discussion is an assessment of the results. Methodological considerations along with the way in which the results compare to earlier research on the go are discussed.


    • Restate your thesis from the introduction in various words
    • Briefly summarise each main point found in the human body associated with the paper (1-2 sentences for every single point). Give a statement associated with consequences of not embracing the positioning (argumentative paper only)
    • End with a clincher that is strong: the right, meaningful final sentence that ties the entire point associated with paper together


    • All documents mentioned into the article should really be included in the bibliography so the reader has the capacity to relate to the original sources.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *